Perfectionists often defend their habits as high standards, and the two can look alike from a distance. Both involve caring about quality. Both involve effort beyond the minimum. But they operate on completely different engines, and in a comeback the difference matters enormously. High standards pull you forward. Perfectionism holds you in place.
The core difference
High standards are about the work. A person with high standards wants the report to be excellent, the practice session to be focused, the conversation to be honest. When the work falls short, they look at the work and improve it. Perfectionism is about the self. A perfectionist needs the work to be flawless because a flaw in the work feels like a flaw in them. When the work falls short, they do not see a draft to improve. They see a verdict.
That difference explains nearly everything else. Standards are a tool. Perfectionism is a defense.
How perfectionism shows up after a setback
Setbacks tend to make perfectionism worse, because the self already feels wounded and the need to prove something grows. Some common patterns:
- Not starting, because the first attempt will not be good enough and a bad attempt feels unbearable.
- Not finishing, because finishing means exposing the work to judgment.
- Abandoning a habit entirely after one missed day, since an imperfect streak feels worthless.
- Dismissing real progress because it falls short of an imagined ideal.
- Exhaustion, because every task is approached as if the stakes were total.
Each of these slows a comeback, and together they can stop it.
What high standards look like instead
People with genuinely high standards share a few habits that perfectionists find difficult. They produce rough drafts freely, because a draft is a step, not a statement. They finish things, knowing that a finished imperfect thing can be improved and an unfinished perfect thing does not exist. They keep going after a missed day, because the standard applies to the long run, not to each instance. And they can tell the difference between work that matters and work that just needs to be done, and they spend their best effort accordingly.
Making the shift
Moving from perfectionism toward high standards is less about lowering the bar than about relocating it. Some practices that help:
- Define good enough in advance, before starting. Write down what done looks like, then stop when you reach it.
- Set time limits on tasks. A report that gets two hours gets two hours. The constraint forces prioritizing what matters.
- Ship something imperfect on purpose, small and low-stakes, and notice what actually happens. Usually nothing.
- Separate the review from the doing. Make the draft without judgment; judge the draft later, as a fair editor would.
- Ask whether the standard you are applying is one you would apply to a colleague you respect. If not, it is not a standard. It is a punishment.
Why this matters in a comeback
A comeback is, by nature, imperfect. You are starting from behind, with less than you had, making your way through unfamiliar territory. Perfectionism cannot tolerate that situation and will look for ways to avoid it, usually by not acting. High standards can work with it: do the best you reasonably can today, learn, and do a little better tomorrow. That is not settling. It is how every excellent thing has ever been built.
If perfectionism is severe enough to cause persistent distress or paralysis, a counselor can help; it is a common pattern with well-understood approaches. For most people, though, the work is to notice the difference, choose the standard over the defense, and let good enough be the path to great.
New messages, real moments from the road, and the All Is Well Project. Follow along and say hello.
The lessons behind everything Chris teaches. Start with three chapters, free.
Turn the lessons into your comeback.
Talk it through free with the Team Dorrity coach, or work with Chris one-on-one in The Better Than Back Experience.
